Comments on: Woopra vs. The Competition (Technically Speaking) http://www.woopra.com/blog/2008/05/23/woopra-vs-the-competition-technically-speaking/ The new web analytics program Tue, 06 Jan 2009 17:56:46 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 By: joshtaylor http://www.woopra.com/blog/2008/05/23/woopra-vs-the-competition-technically-speaking/#comment-815 joshtaylor Tue, 17 Jun 2008 00:37:33 +0000 http://www.woopra.com/?p=115#comment-815 People block google analytics ;-). People block google analytics ;-).

]]> By: brandonks http://www.woopra.com/blog/2008/05/23/woopra-vs-the-competition-technically-speaking/#comment-634 brandonks Tue, 03 Jun 2008 04:02:26 +0000 http://www.woopra.com/?p=115#comment-634 woopra isn't even working for me right now :( woopra isn’t even working for me right now :(

]]> By: Strofaria http://www.woopra.com/blog/2008/05/23/woopra-vs-the-competition-technically-speaking/#comment-632 Strofaria Mon, 02 Jun 2008 23:10:44 +0000 http://www.woopra.com/?p=115#comment-632 Server location : Italy Woopra 3 KB 172 ms GA 10 KB 235 ms Server location : Italy

Woopra 3 KB 172 ms
GA 10 KB 235 ms

]]> By: jkinflow http://www.woopra.com/blog/2008/05/23/woopra-vs-the-competition-technically-speaking/#comment-628 jkinflow Mon, 02 Jun 2008 09:59:34 +0000 http://www.woopra.com/?p=115#comment-628 Hi Has any of you guys included Indextools in your tests? Or what about the danish Netminers? Still waitin approval as well, now soon waiting for a month (since the 8. of april) Hi

Has any of you guys included Indextools in your tests? Or what about the danish Netminers?

Still waitin approval as well, now soon waiting for a month (since the 8. of april)

]]> By: Woopra Speed Up | LazyBrain.de http://www.woopra.com/blog/2008/05/23/woopra-vs-the-competition-technically-speaking/#comment-610 Woopra Speed Up | LazyBrain.de Fri, 30 May 2008 15:26:10 +0000 http://www.woopra.com/?p=115#comment-610 [...] gut, Woopra selbst ist, wie man hier nachlesen kann, schon mal sehr flott, was vor allem an der geringen Größe des Javascripts-Files von Woopra [...] [...] gut, Woopra selbst ist, wie man hier nachlesen kann, schon mal sehr flott, was vor allem an der geringen Größe des Javascripts-Files von Woopra [...]

]]> By: wizard http://www.woopra.com/blog/2008/05/23/woopra-vs-the-competition-technically-speaking/#comment-608 wizard Fri, 30 May 2008 13:14:20 +0000 http://www.woopra.com/?p=115#comment-608 I'd be happy to help but my site is still pending approval and has been for some time. I’d be happy to help but my site is still pending approval and has been for some time.

]]> By: nahu http://www.woopra.com/blog/2008/05/23/woopra-vs-the-competition-technically-speaking/#comment-603 nahu Thu, 29 May 2008 06:32:30 +0000 http://www.woopra.com/?p=115#comment-603 Hmm same here, I've noticed a lot of discrepancy between GA and feedburner stats. And I know for a fact that neither is doing a good job at reporting referers. Cant wait for woopra to shine some light into the matter. I'll be patient, rock on guys! Hmm same here, I’ve noticed a lot of discrepancy between GA and feedburner stats. And I know for a fact that neither is doing a good job at reporting referers. Cant wait for woopra to shine some light into the matter. I’ll be patient, rock on guys!

]]> By: Mad.Photo.World http://www.woopra.com/blog/2008/05/23/woopra-vs-the-competition-technically-speaking/#comment-585 Mad.Photo.World Tue, 27 May 2008 09:28:34 +0000 http://www.woopra.com/?p=115#comment-585 I have actually stop using analytics because sometimes the load time is soo high! and since im running a photo site people tends to move on really quickly and GA missing them sometimes. When i analyze the webserver log files i can see that GA has missed a couple of users. Im currently using feedburner which is much, much faster (yes yes google bought them ... ... .) Alot of the customers i program for is looking at episerver solution because of the built in live tracking, so woopra could be a good alternative to it. im really looking forward to trying it out. I have actually stop using analytics because sometimes the load time is soo high! and since im running a photo site people tends to move on really quickly and GA missing them sometimes. When i analyze the webserver log files i can see that GA has missed a couple of users.

Im currently using feedburner which is much, much faster (yes yes google bought them … … .)
Alot of the customers i program for is looking at episerver solution because of the built in live tracking, so woopra could be a good alternative to it. im really looking forward to trying it out.

]]> By: goldcoaster http://www.woopra.com/blog/2008/05/23/woopra-vs-the-competition-technically-speaking/#comment-583 goldcoaster Tue, 27 May 2008 02:31:32 +0000 http://www.woopra.com/?p=115#comment-583 I currently use Google Analytics and it is good because it monitors all my blogs. PMetrics free service only monitors 3 and only 1000 page views. StatCounter only has a log of 500 entries so no good either. What restrictions are on woopra free edition - when / if I get approved can I add muliple sites or do I only get approval for one site and need to apply again and again (hope that is not the case)? cheers from Australia. I currently use Google Analytics and it is good because it monitors all my blogs. PMetrics free service only monitors 3 and only 1000 page views. StatCounter only has a log of 500 entries so no good either.
What restrictions are on woopra free edition - when / if I get approved can I add muliple sites or do I only get approval for one site and need to apply again and again (hope that is not the case)?

cheers from Australia.

]]> By: ashdodia http://www.woopra.com/blog/2008/05/23/woopra-vs-the-competition-technically-speaking/#comment-582 ashdodia Mon, 26 May 2008 19:58:49 +0000 http://www.woopra.com/?p=115#comment-582 My site: http://www.relatip.com number of visitors in 5 days: Google: 215 - Woopra 207 (i believe the difference is due to time diff) Loading times (my server located in Israel): Woopra: 3KB in 594ms, 126b in 453ms Google: 10KB in 188ms, 35b in 178ms I guess that google CDN for countries outside the US is faster. Still I believe I will keep with WOOPRA as it is far better in several aspects. Saar. My site: http://www.relatip.com
number of visitors in 5 days:
Google: 215 - Woopra 207 (i believe the difference is due to time diff)
Loading times (my server located in Israel):
Woopra: 3KB in 594ms, 126b in 453ms
Google: 10KB in 188ms, 35b in 178ms

I guess that google CDN for countries outside the US is faster.

Still I believe I will keep with WOOPRA as it is far better in several aspects.
Saar.

]]>