<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>Woopra Forums User Favorites: blacklabel</title>
<link>http://www.woopra.com/forums/</link>
<description>Woopra Forums User Favorites: blacklabel</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 21:39:45 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>coastal on "Woopra Is Unbelievably Innacurate"</title>
<link>http://www.woopra.com/forums/topic/woopra-is-unbelievably-innacurate#post-6157</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 07:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>coastal</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">6157@http://www.woopra.com/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;I don't have awestats at the moment or I'd check this out as well. My first thought is Woopra is not catching &#34;cached pages&#34;.&#60;br /&#62;
I use activemeter as my other stat provider and my stats are higher on this counter than Woopra.  We're probably never going to get 100% not with a script based stat/counter.&#60;br /&#62;
I would be much happier to run a program right from my server then find away to have google,aol, and all the other page cachers to cough up their stats.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>tarzan007 on "Woopra Is Unbelievably Innacurate"</title>
<link>http://www.woopra.com/forums/topic/woopra-is-unbelievably-innacurate#post-6066</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 16:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>tarzan007</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">6066@http://www.woopra.com/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;eeeksss... that hurts man
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Black Label on "Woopra Is Unbelievably Innacurate"</title>
<link>http://www.woopra.com/forums/topic/woopra-is-unbelievably-innacurate#post-6057</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 02:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Black Label</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">6057@http://www.woopra.com/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Okay,&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I've confirmed this through another source.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I am looking at the affiliate numbers for the page that I put up.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Number of impressions for ad: 418&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Number of page views according to Woopra: 230
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Black Label on "Woopra Is Unbelievably Innacurate"</title>
<link>http://www.woopra.com/forums/topic/woopra-is-unbelievably-innacurate#post-6054</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 17:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Black Label</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">6054@http://www.woopra.com/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Okay,&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;So I've been using Woopra since the beginning.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;In fact, I actually completely stopped using Google Analytics in favor of Woopra.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Well today I read an article that said google analytics damages your search engine rankings... so I decided to remove it.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Before I did, I looked at the analytics just for kicks... and discovered that the difference between GA and Woopra are insane.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Google registered roughly double the visits/pageviews/unique visitors that Woopra did.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;The tracking on the search engine results shows COMPLETELY different stuff.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Search engine terms woopra was tracking: 226&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Search engine terms google picked up: 654&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Now, if I look at the traffic by referrer, the ranks all stay the same, but google of course tracked A TON more visitors for each.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;So... there is a HUGE portion of people visiting my site that Woopra is not tracking but google does.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;What gives?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
