<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>Woopra Forums Topic: Cost</title>
<link>http://www.woopra.com/forums/</link>
<description>Woopra Forums Topic: Cost</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 08:33:52 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>flyboy on "Cost"</title>
<link>http://www.woopra.com/forums/topic/cost#post-4503</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 14:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>flyboy</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">4503@http://www.woopra.com/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;I'd rather pay whatever it costs then have my client's metrics sold. I work really hard determining which search phrases create the best conversions for my clients. One of the reasons I don't use Google Analytics is they take your metrics and turn them back into their free keyword suggestion tool. I've never understood how one can be paid to get one's client in the top pages of the search engines, only to place Google Spyware on the client's site so that your terms are given back to all your client's competitors knocking you out of first page positions. In fact, I define a &#34;good SEO&#34; as someone that has the common sense not to use Google Analytics.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Lorelle VanFossen on "Cost"</title>
<link>http://www.woopra.com/forums/topic/cost#post-4472</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 17:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Lorelle VanFossen</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">4472@http://www.woopra.com/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Could you please be more specific?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>dmacros on "Cost"</title>
<link>http://www.woopra.com/forums/topic/cost#post-4458</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 08:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>dmacros</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">4458@http://www.woopra.com/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;How about reselling white label woopra model for webmasters?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>sambeckett on "Cost"</title>
<link>http://www.woopra.com/forums/topic/cost#post-2357</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 20:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>sambeckett</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2357@http://www.woopra.com/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;If woopra charges based on page views, I don't think I can afford to use your product when compared to other free and unlimited services.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I might pay money for extra features and services.  Just not if it they are based on page views. Paying based on page views does not scale very well...
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>stefanv on "Cost"</title>
<link>http://www.woopra.com/forums/topic/cost#post-2318</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 14:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>stefanv</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">2318@http://www.woopra.com/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Hi, is there any new info about the pricing models? I have around 6-8 million pageviews per day and I guess that will put me in the Enterprise sectio. But since it involves quite a lot of work of changing tracking tools I would like to know approximately what the cost would be. Of course, I can wait until the product goes live, but I can imagine that we could also be quite decent beta testers since we can put this on the  smaller sites to begin with and then scale up the traffic when you guys are ready for it.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>MrJef on "Cost"</title>
<link>http://www.woopra.com/forums/topic/cost#post-793</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 23:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>MrJef</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">793@http://www.woopra.com/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;John,&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Sorry,  I should have clarified what I meant about selling metrics, as that does sound kind of awful shady marketing ploy to collect identity data, which I did not mean to imply.  I was thinking something like a Comscore, or Nielsen ratings kind of information.  IE since you are collecting search stats, you could easily have the information on &#34;popular search terms over the last 7 days&#34; which would contain information from all the major search engines that lead to sites using woopra, etc.  Yahoo, MSN, and Google all collect this data, but for their own service.  You would be seeing it across all services.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I think if you are going to offer the full boat of services, that maybe it should be based upon traffic.  A site like mine, is a personal blog, and gets very little traffic.  My site's overall impact on the service as far as collection goes is minimal, compared to a large ecommerce site with tons of visitors.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;So, I could see you setting site classifications, so that smaller sites can still use the service, and the larger volume sites pay into using the service to offset what resources they use.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Statcounter.com used action log history as a differential.  Smaller sites with less traffic took longer to fill the log span, while larger sites would fill it quicker, so they sold larger log spans for the higher volume sites. Everyone has the same bucket,  but more active sites fill the bucket quicker, so they may want to buy a bigger bucket to contain stats to trend off of.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;You had mentioned in a previous post about a 90 day stat retention window.  I could see for sites interested in long term marketing, as longer time spans being something they would want to spend money on.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;PS - not a marketing guy...just a techie guy... I have no idea what I am talking about here :)
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>John P. on "Cost"</title>
<link>http://www.woopra.com/forums/topic/cost#post-785</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 22:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>John P.</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">785@http://www.woopra.com/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;We will NOT sell the metrics we collect.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I would not expect us to remove features.  In fact, our plan is to add more features.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;But like Lorelle said, we're still working on the model.  In the meantime, if you guys have suggestions as to how we should price things and how much they should be, feel free to advise! :-)&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;John
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>MrJef on "Cost"</title>
<link>http://www.woopra.com/forums/topic/cost#post-784</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 22:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>MrJef</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">784@http://www.woopra.com/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;From The Terms of Service at &#60;a href=&#34;http://www.woopra.com/tos&#34; rel=&#34;nofollow&#34;&#62;http://www.woopra.com/tos&#60;/a&#62;:&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;FEES and SERVICES. The basic functionality provided by the Woopra service is provided free of charge. Woopra may change its fee structure and/or provide an upgrade service at any time with notice. &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;The keyword is &#34;basic&#34; in the TOS.  I am going to expect some of the features (Live view?) we are enjoying in the beta will be moved to a premium tier which will cost.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;This is an excellent service, so I would expect them to have some sort of revenue service.  Maybe they will just be selling the metrics they collect?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>headshrink on "Cost"</title>
<link>http://www.woopra.com/forums/topic/cost#post-783</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 22:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>headshrink</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">783@http://www.woopra.com/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Will there always be a free version?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Lorelle VanFossen on "Cost"</title>
<link>http://www.woopra.com/forums/topic/cost#post-739</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 18:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Lorelle VanFossen</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">739@http://www.woopra.com/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;We're still working on how to monetize Woopra. Stay tuned for news, but for now, enjoy the free version while we work on it, and break it, and fix it, and break it, and fix it... :D
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>babyreflux on "Cost"</title>
<link>http://www.woopra.com/forums/topic/cost#post-633</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 03:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>babyreflux</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">633@http://www.woopra.com/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Hi...just received my invitation and downloaded the software.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Firstly, very very impressed. Blown away in fact with the functionality so I'll have a good play around and come back with some questions. &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I do have a question to the Woopra software gods regarding cost and pricing model. I appreciate that nothing will be finalised as yet so just an idea will be helpful...before I get too excited about using Woopra in the future.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Will it be like Basecamp? 'Cheap', good value and a package cost depending on impressions/use/storage etc. (starting at under $30 per month)?&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;...or will it be aimed more at more substantial sites - $40-$50 plus?&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Thanks,&#60;br /&#62;
JP.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
