<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>Woopra Forums Topic: Is 64-bit OS appearing as Windows Server 2003?</title>
<link>http://www.woopra.com/forums/</link>
<description>Woopra Forums Topic: Is 64-bit OS appearing as Windows Server 2003?</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 08:38:21 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>iTwins on "Is 64-bit OS appearing as Windows Server 2003?"</title>
<link>http://www.woopra.com/forums/topic/is-64-bit-os-appearing-as-windows-server-2003#post-3157</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 11:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>iTwins</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">3157@http://www.woopra.com/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;hehe...now that you mention this, yea, I think x64 is identified as Win2k3. Surprised though, I only have 10 x64 users out of 2571 uniques.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>BunnDev on "Is 64-bit OS appearing as Windows Server 2003?"</title>
<link>http://www.woopra.com/forums/topic/is-64-bit-os-appearing-as-windows-server-2003#post-3154</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 03:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>BunnDev</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">3154@http://www.woopra.com/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;This is still an issue, I can't believe 30% of our visitors are using Windows Server 2003.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Lazy on "Is 64-bit OS appearing as Windows Server 2003?"</title>
<link>http://www.woopra.com/forums/topic/is-64-bit-os-appearing-as-windows-server-2003#post-1435</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 03:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Lazy</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">1435@http://www.woopra.com/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;And Firefox 4 (Dev) is showing up as Firefox 0 (?)
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>BunnDev on "Is 64-bit OS appearing as Windows Server 2003?"</title>
<link>http://www.woopra.com/forums/topic/is-64-bit-os-appearing-as-windows-server-2003#post-1433</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 02:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>BunnDev</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">1433@http://www.woopra.com/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Hi all,&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;In our stats 23% of all visitors are being reported as using Windows Server 2003 as their OS.  Is this right or is Woopra identifying the OS incorrectly, i.e. 64-bit XP being identified as Server 2003?&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I'm only guessing this as you apply Server 2003 patches to 64-bit XP.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Thanks
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
