http://www.woopra.com/forums/ Woopra Forums Topic: Linux client totally broken en Wed, 03 Dec 2008 08:36:14 +0000 http://www.woopra.com/forums/topic/linux-client-totally-broken#post-888 Wed, 30 Apr 2008 09:08:34 +0000 Carlitos 888@http://www.woopra.com/forums/ <p>maco: the Linux client is not "totally broken", quite the opposite. Please see the other thread <a>here</a>.</p> <p>And please, this is a beta, so we're actually SUPPOSED to find bugs. The Woopra team has done an amazing job, so don't go saying that the developers "didn't actually test this"... that will only upset the team, and trust me, we all want a happy, massively profitable Woopra project (that way we can hope it'll stay free :-)</p> <p>Regards, </p> http://www.woopra.com/forums/topic/linux-client-totally-broken#post-824 Wed, 30 Apr 2008 02:06:08 +0000 Carlitos 824@http://www.woopra.com/forums/ <p>The Linux client is anything but "totally broken". Please have a look here: <a href="http://www.woopra.com/forums/topic/anyone-running-the-linux-version-of-woopra" rel="nofollow">http://www.woopra.com/forums/topic/anyone-running-the-linux-version-of-woopra</a> </p> http://www.woopra.com/forums/topic/linux-client-totally-broken#post-806 Wed, 30 Apr 2008 00:47:21 +0000 James 806@http://www.woopra.com/forums/ <p>There is a fix in the other linux topic on here :) </p> http://www.woopra.com/forums/topic/linux-client-totally-broken#post-794 Tue, 29 Apr 2008 23:33:44 +0000 georgia_tech_swagger 794@http://www.woopra.com/forums/ <p>Confirmed; Completely broken on all 4 of my Linux machines. </p> http://www.woopra.com/forums/topic/linux-client-totally-broken#post-497 Sun, 27 Apr 2008 23:47:30 +0000 James 497@http://www.woopra.com/forums/ <p>Are they even aware of this? </p> http://www.woopra.com/forums/topic/linux-client-totally-broken#post-483 Sun, 27 Apr 2008 19:21:31 +0000 maco 483@http://www.woopra.com/forums/ <p>It can't be installed because the tail offset when making the .tar.gz is wrong, and even when it's corrected it's corrupted. Add to that that install4j.class is missing, and it seems to me the devs didn't actually test this. </p>